Property Intelligence Workbench · Data Quality

Every score is only as good as its evidence.

Domain-level coverage, freshness, confidence, and open conflicts — updated continuously from the ingestion pipeline.

Overall graph coverage

82%

Weighted by domain criticality

Avg confidence

0.81

Bayesian roll-up across sources

Open conflicts

Queued for analyst review

Sources registered

Verified · licensed · deferred

Domains

Coverage, freshness & confidence by domain

Domain	Coverage	Avg freshness	Confidence	Open conflicts	Sources	Status
Parcels	94%	14 d	0.91	6	3	STRUCTURAL
Buildings & footprints	88%	22 d	0.86	12	4	STRUCTURAL
Ownership	97%	9 d	0.93	4	2	STRUCTURAL
Zoning districts + overlays	82%	31 d	0.79	18	5	STRUCTURAL
Permits	71%	5 d	0.74	22	6	SIMULATED
Transactions	68%	18 d	0.72	9	3	SIMULATED
Infrastructure (fiber, telecom, utility)	54%	60 d	0.66	14	4	DEFERRED
Environmental (flood, EJ, brownfields)	77%	45 d	0.81	3	3	STRUCTURAL

Signal

Verified paths

· Parcel identity chain (APN → AIREx ID)
· County assessor overlays
· Municipal zoning ordinance ingest
· FEMA + NFHL flood layers

Watch

Attention

· Permit stream latency > 5 days in 3 municipalities
· Ownership conflicts across LLC layers
· FAR overlay disagreements in 2 townships

Pipeline

Ingestion lanes

· 15-stage pipeline · STRUCTURAL
· Provenance ledger append-only
· Conflicts reviewed in Data Operations

Demonstration Data — Not a Verified Public Record. Every number, opportunity, comparable and forecast in this workbench is an informational estimate. Confirm with zoning, engineering, valuation and legal professionals.